|
|
When submitting an offer, the ordering party requires suppliers/contractors to have a plant, experience or qualifications or equipment in a given country or region. In this case, a financial correction of % of the funding is imposed . If the above-mentioned conditions apply, but a minimum level of competition is ensured, i.e. offers meeting the qualification criteria have been received and accepted from a number of contractors, the percentage rate is then % of the funding . Insufficient or imprecise definition of the subject of the contract.
The description in the contract notice or the specification of essential terms of the contract is insufficient or inaccurate and may prevent potential tenderers/candidates from fully determining the subject of the contract, which may have a deterrent or potentially restrictive effect on competition. In such photo retouching a case, a refund amount equal to % of the funding is imposed . However, the number of inquiries submitted by potential bidders is not an if the contracting authority provides appropriate answers to the bidders' inquiries. Changes have been made to the selection criteria (or technical specifications) after the opening of tenders or the criteria (or specifications) have been applied incorrectly.
A situation where the contracting authority has changed or incorrectly applied the selection criteria (or technical specifications) at the selection stage, resulting in the acceptance of winning tenders that should not have been accepted (or the rejection of tenders that should have been accepted) had the published selection criteria been followed. In this case, the correction imposed will amount to % of the funding. If the ordering party clearly demonstrates that the rejected bid would not have won under any circumstances, the irregularity will have no financial consequences.
|
|
發表於 16:29:30